FundedNext vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, profit splits, drawdown rules, payouts and Trustpilot ratings.
FundedNext vs FundingPips: Overview
FundedNext and FundingPips are two prop trading firms founded in 2022 and based in the UAE, catering to traders worldwide. FundedNext stands out with its diverse platform offerings including MT4, MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade, supporting a wide range of assets from Forex to Futures. FundingPips, meanwhile, impresses with a massive maximum allocation of up to $2,000,000 and a strong focus on flexible payout schedules. Both firms allow news trading and weekend holding, making them attractive for active and strategic traders seeking variety and freedom in their trading approach. Their UAE base ensures robust regulatory environments and access to global markets, appealing to many serious traders.
FundedNext emphasizes affordability and variety in challenge types, offering multiple evaluation routes like Stellar 2-Step and Express. FundingPips offers unique challenge types like Zero and 2-Step Pro, focusing on faster paths to funding with competitive pricing. Each firm provides innovative solutions to scaling traders' capital, but their unique strengths cater to different trader preferences and goals.
Full Comparison Table
| Feature | FundedNext4.5(65,288) | FundingPips4.5(52,783) |
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot Rating | 4.5/5 (65,288 reviews) | 4.5/5 (52,783 reviews) |
| Profit Split | Up to 95% | Up to 100% |
| Max Allocation | $400,000 | $2,000,000 |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand | Weekly, Bi-weekly, On-demand, Monthly |
| Payout Methods | Bank Transfer, Crypto, Deel, PayPal | Bank Transfer, Crypto |
| Min. Payout | No minimum | No minimum for crypto, $500 for RISE |
| Max Daily Drawdown | 5% | 5% (2-Step) / 3% (1-Step) |
| Max Total Drawdown | 10% | 10% (2-Step) / 6% (1-Step) |
| News Trading | ||
| Weekend Holding | ||
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade | MT5, cTrader, Match Trader |
| Assets | Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies, Stocks, Futures | Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies |
| Country | AE | AE |
| Year Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
Challenge Prices | ||
| Account Size | FundedNext | FundingPips |
| $5,000 | — | $29Best |
| $6,000 | $49.99Best | — |
| $10,000 | — | $66Best |
| $15,000 | $109.99Best | — |
| $25,000 | $189.99 | $156Best |
| $50,000 | $269.99Best | $289 |
| $100,000 | $529.99 | $399Best |
| $200,000 | $1,049.99Best | — |
Challenge Pricing Comparison
When it comes to challenge pricing, FundingPips offers the cheapest entry at $29.00 for a $5,000 account via their 2-Step-Pro challenge, making it highly accessible for new traders. FundedNext’s cheapest option is $49.99 for a $6,000 account on the Stellar 2-Step, which is still competitive but noticeably higher.
Comparing key account sizes side by side:
- $5,000: FundingPips $29.00 vs FundedNext N/A
- $6,000: FundedNext $49.99 vs FundingPips N/A
- $25,000: FundingPips $156.00 vs FundedNext $189.99
- $50,000: FundingPips $289.00 vs FundedNext $269.99
Overall, FundingPips is more affordable for smaller accounts and remains competitive across larger sizes. FundedNext’s pricing is slightly higher but offers additional challenge types and account options, which may justify the cost for some traders.
Trading Rules & Drawdown
Both firms enforce strict drawdown rules to protect capital, but FundedNext and FundingPips share a max total drawdown of 10% on their 2-Step challenges. However, FundingPips offers a tighter max daily drawdown of 3% on their 1-Step compared to FundedNext’s flat 5% daily limit.
Key trading rules comparison:
- News Trading: Allowed (both)
- Weekend Holding: Allowed (both)
- Max Daily Drawdown: FundedNext 5%, FundingPips 5% (2-Step) / 3% (1-Step)
- Max Total Drawdown: FundedNext 10%, FundingPips 10% (2-Step) / 6% (1-Step)
FundedNext’s uniform drawdown limits provide simplicity, while FundingPips offers a tiered approach with more restrictive limits for faster challenge types. Both are flexible with news and weekend trades, but FundingPips’ tiered rules offer more customization for different trader styles. Thus, FundingPips edges out as more flexible overall.
Payouts & Profit Splits
FundingPips leads with a profit split of up to 100%, surpassing FundedNext’s maximum of 95%. This gives FundingPips traders the potential to keep full profits, a significant advantage for high performers.
Payout methods comparison:
- FundedNext: Bank Transfer, Crypto, Deel, PayPal
- FundingPips: Bank Transfer, Crypto
FundingPips offers more frequent payout options including weekly, bi-weekly, on-demand, and monthly, while FundedNext provides only on-demand payouts. FundedNext does support PayPal and Deel, which can be convenient for some traders, but FundingPips’ frequency and full profit retention make withdrawals easier and more lucrative.
Overall, FundingPips wins in payout generosity and flexibility, though FundedNext provides more payout method variety.
Trustpilot & Community Reputation
FundedNext holds a Trustpilot rating of 4.5/5 from 65,288 reviews, while FundingPips also has 4.5/5 but with 52,783 reviews. Both firms enjoy strong trader approval with large, active communities.
Traders praise FundedNext for its smooth challenge process, diverse platforms, and fast payouts, though some mention occasional customer service delays. FundingPips receives high marks for generous profit splits and flexible funding options, but a few traders note stricter drawdown rules on certain challenges.
Given the slightly higher review volume and consistent positive feedback, FundedNext has a marginally stronger community trust. Both firms rank highly, but FundedNext’s broader user base tips the scales.
Our Verdict: FundedNext vs FundingPips
In this head-to-head comparison, FundingPips wins pricing with the cheapest entry at $29 and competitive fees across multiple account sizes. For trading rules, FundingPips again leads with more flexible, tiered drawdown limits suited to different trader profiles. When it comes to payouts, FundingPips dominates with up to 100% profit splits and more frequent payout options. However, in reputation, FundedNext has a slight edge due to more reviews and consistent positive feedback.
Overall, FundingPips takes the crown for traders prioritizing profit potential, affordability, and flexible trading rules. FundedNext remains a strong contender for those valuing platform variety and a more established community. For most traders seeking maximum profit and funding scale, FundingPips is the overall winner.
Choose FundedNext if...
Choose FundedNext if you want a well-rounded, trader-friendly experience with multiple platforms and a large community. Reasons to consider FundedNext:
- Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade
- Large variety of challenge types including Stellar Lite and Express
- Strong Trustpilot rating with over 65,000 reviews
- No minimum payout and convenient PayPal and Deel options
- Allows trading futures alongside Forex and crypto
Choose FundingPips if...
Choose FundingPips for the best profit splits, lowest entry costs, and highly flexible payout schedules. Reasons to pick FundingPips:
- Up to 100% profit split, maximizing trader earnings
- Cheapest challenge starting at $29 for $5,000 account
- Massive max allocation of $2,000,000 for scaling traders
- Multiple payout frequencies: weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, on-demand
- Tiered drawdown rules offering tailored trading challenge difficulty
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FundedNext or FundingPips better for beginners?
Which prop firm has a better profit split, FundedNext or FundingPips?
Which firm allows faster payouts, FundedNext or FundingPips?
Which has lower challenge prices, FundedNext or FundingPips?
Which firm has better Trustpilot reviews, FundedNext or FundingPips?
What is the maximum drawdown at FundedNext vs FundingPips?
Can I use EAs and copy trading with FundedNext and FundingPips?
Other Popular Comparisons
Not sure which firm to choose?
Compare up to 3 prop firms side by side with our interactive comparator, or browse all 50+ firms.